| THINK TO YOURSELF - 1 |
 |  |  |
|
| From Men's Sites: think to yourself -1 Yes, we need to be organized to take on the larger battles, but first every man needs to look at himself and take steps to ensure he is not contributing to the problems. The movement as a whole will gain more and more strength as each man individually takes personal responsibility for the choices he makes. The media: Let us not believe for a minute the mainstream media is on the side of the American male in any way,shape,or form. Forbes magazines had a cover story,a few weeks ago, about the role reversal of males as stay at home moms and females as the breadwinners in the family. Newsweek had the same kind of puff piece for women(She Works,He Doesn't) just last week. Business Week highlighted the growing gender gap between boys and girls in schools,with girls coming out the better. These pieces are congratulation pieces for the women's movement,as the media,through its' stories in its' mainstream newspapers,magazines,through its' TV shows,its' movies,show women,always, in a positive light and show men in a negative one. Could any man today,go and read a mainstream newspaper and read a positive article about men in general?The social engineers that populate most if not all media and entertainment outlets in the US are usually ,very much,pro-woman,as are the advertisers they work with and always intimidate with economic boycotts if matters do not go their way. The old saying goes if you don't stand for something you shall stand for nothing. Whatever gets them the edge is all they care about and they think it is a zero sum game so just remember they believe: whats mine is mine and whats yours is mine. Fight on and let us know if we can help. And don't let the pussified guys trip you up, that's what they do. What we need to do is start to train our daughters to be more equal minded and not feel that men owe them any special treatment based on what is between their legs. Men need to voice opinion How many women marry down on the economic scale? How many of those women who want a managerial position would seek to marry a house-husband and take full responsibility for the financial load? Very few. They mostly seek to marry up, to marry men on higher financial ground. By doing so they set the stage for their own failure, then turn and blame sexism. This is why the "paying for dates" issue is so important. This is the impetus of the sexism in relationships. This is where is all begins. This is why those "gentlemanly standards" of servitude need to become gender neutral. Women need to change themselves in order to advance, not blame or expect men to do so for them. We have our own issues. And there are more women who still think it's the man's job to be financially responsible for them-especially in divorce. Its not ignorant, it's the way it is. Why are men ignorant, why the attack on men for holding to the same old standards that women do? Men are ignorant for wanting a woman to stay at home, but women are not for wanting men to serve them by opening doors, paying for dates, asking them out, doing the dirty work? Again, the blame men tactic does not work because it is hollow, empty, nonsensical as we see women doing the same thing. Men should have clubs where it is men only. ie football, golf, gardening where men can go and just be amongst there own Its gone way beyond that. Most of us would be pretty happy if male athletes could just win the right to change and shower in the locker room without having women present. See, here is how it works. A womans right to privacy supersedes a man's right to work (as we see in women only health clubs). A women's right to work supersedes a man's right to privacy (as we see with women in the locker room, women strip searching male prisoners in our correctional facilities, supervising male showers, men toileting). Bottom line? We have every right to be a bit miffed here-and the only thing that is our fault is our allowing these type of arguments to curb our demand for equality, and for our lack of action. Women do have those, and plenty of them. It is men who don't. Look at the Augusta issue. Martha Burke finally said it out loud in an interview with Bill Moyers. She stated that men should not have clubs without women to supervise because men behave badly, talk about women badly when they are left alone-and women don't. In short, as one feminist author wrote, "Women only good, men only bad. PC feminism is so simple". Stop focusing on the minority of guys with their heads up their arses. Ya need to stop telling us what we are and start learning about us for real (beyond what is written in the funny papers. :) What I presented is factual, and based on decades of work with men's issues. This is a great place to learn, but a poor place to preach. . I assume this girl took my potential job only because she had a vagina not experience. Supposedly the company gets a large tax break if they employ enough women. Not only do I have to compete with people for experience, education, skill, and now gender. Is it fair? No... NEXT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|