| What Men Know That Women Don't? |
 |  |  |
| Political Commentary and Option FATHERS CANADA NEWS "We have all witnessed the fact, that even when a woman is arrested and charged, she is far from likely to be judged or punished with the same standards that men are." |
| What men know that women don't Print edition Simply type 'Rich Zubaty' into your local Amazon store: USA/ UK/ Canada/ Germany/ France Electronic edition (PDF) (the electronic version is being sold directly through this website via paypal. Please allow 24 hours for delivery via email)Get first chapter of 'What men know that women don't' Free! PART 1: "Exclusive Interview with the author Rich Zubaty DB: You’ve been knocking around out here for a while Rich. It seems you were years ahead of the curve in your observations on feminism. Indeed, after spending several years studying the subject online your writings still seem fresh and insightful. But a lot of people say you hate women. RZ: I don’t hate tigers, and I don’t hate women. They’re both beautiful to behold. But if I fail to appreciate they both have fangs and inscrutable natures I could get clawed. DB: Many people in the men's movement see feminism as a form of socialism - left-wing, anti-capitalist ideas. Yet you see feminism and large corporations as being in a symbiotic relationship. RZ: In the UK and Europe feminism is socialistic. But it’s different in the USA. Early on feminism formed an unholy alliance with big corporations. The original funding sources for U.S. feminism were the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations. Ford and Rockefeller don’t fund socialists. But what really really bothers me is that no one, on the left or right, talks about the unintended consequences of feminism. The unintended consequences of feminism. DB: Which are? RZ: 1) Feminism was the biggest scab labor movement in history. Union membership in the USA plummeted as millions of women joined the work force. A guy with a wife and two kids to support lost his job to a woman who had only herself and payments on a Volkswagen to cover. She could work for less, and she certainly wasn’t going to jeopardize her new position in the company by joining a union. 2) The so-called “information economy” was virtually invented for working women. 40 years into feminism and less than one percent of bricklayers and asphalt pourers are women. More than 50% of managers are women. We have lost any reasonable idea of what productive work really is. DB: How so? RZ: A woman wakes up in the morning in a house built by men. She drives to work in a car built by men on roads built by men. She enters an office building built by men and flips on a light switch connected to an electrical grid built and maintained by men. She washes her hands in a sink connected to a plumbing system put there by men. She scratches her chin and looks around. Her eyes settle on a folding table. Suddenly the janitor appears. She points her finger and says, “Bob, would you please move that table over there.” Her work day has begun. And so it goes. She thinks she’s at home. She really believes her job involves nothing more than telling people what to do all day. Put the socks in the hamper, walk the dog, don’t forget your gym shoes. That’s it. That’s work. If we relied on the work accomplished by women we would be living in caves eating cold seeds. They don’t get it. And that brings me to my third point about the unintended consequences of feminism. DB: What’s that? RZ: 3) Feminism was, from the beginning, a consumer movement. Their battle cry was, “I want my own job so I can have my own money so I can buy my own stuff.” It played right into the corporate agenda. Women want to buy things, corporations want to sell them things. Women get “high” from shopping. Corporate stocks get higher the more they can sell them. And the sheer explosion of corporate fast food chains and automobiles and big box stores - consumerism run rampant serving these women who “don’t cook” - is a direct consequence of working women. Remember, “mater” the Latin word for mother, is the root word of materialism. Women are more materialistic than men. DB: Hah. RZ: But it gets worse. In 40 years of feminism real wages have stayed flat, but the prices of everything from bread to gas to housing have shot up from 300% to 500%. I used to pay 25 cents for a gallon of gas in the 60s and now it costs over 2 bucks. Working women are a disaster. The work they do is scarcely needed but now everything costs astronomically more. And, need I add, that the “information economy” jobs that were supposed to take the place of all the U.S. manufacturing jobs that were outsourced to Mexico and China, are now themselves being outsourced to India. Women hopped on the corporate bandwagon without questioning anything, without it ever occurring to them that workers have to stick together to prevent being exploited, and now we are sliding off a cliff. |
| "In Sweden calling homosexuals an abomination can get you two years in prison. But calling Christians ignorant homophobics can get you elected to public office. --Website off the Web!!!" |
| We respond to their acts with the same language which they do. |
|
|
FROM MEN'S SITES:
"..What really gets my goat, after hearing that oral contraception is actually already feasible for
men (and has been, for years if not decades), is realizing (again) how things now are so much
more designed to service women, and ignore (if not outright victimize) men.
Women, as you might expect, are constantly touting "The Pill" for them as an all but inalienable
right, and agitating for mandated universal health insurance coverage for them (e.g.,
CoverMyPills.org, "The Need for and Cost of Mandating Private Insurance Coverage of
Contraception"); as, clearly, the 30-40% full coverage under existing plans is a "national scandal",
and must be corrected as soon as possible - never mind that similar protection for men is never
even contemplated or mentioned, let alone incorporated in such demands (as usual).
This, despite the already massively unequal consequences of unintended parenthood for men,
compared to women (as we all know, in no case can a woman ever be a parent against her will
today [not between widely available contraception, legal abortion, plus "legal abandonment"
laws]... whereas for men it happens all the time, and there's nothing any man can do about it, once
it happens; plus, the practical reality that the child-support indentured-servitude machine
essentially soley targets men). I can't speak for anyone else, but this is the sort of thing that really
makes my blood boil.
In any just society, access to effective, safe oral contraceptives would be exactly equal, for both
men and women; of course, we all know it'll be a long time and a lot of work to see anything like
that where we live. Meanwhile, the knowledge that "The Pill" for men exists, and that feminazis are
willfully ignoring its general unavailablity to men while simultaneously pushing for their own access
as a basic right, is yet one more concrete example we can cite, proving their hypocracy and
special pleading.
On a personal level, all of us who know the current facts, can at least check out the suitability of
using these tools to protect ourselves, as well as all fellow men we'd care to save from the "oops"
involuntary-parenthood trap women so love to spring on us - saving the world will take a while yet;
but saving each other, one on one, is at least well within our power right now..."
"..What really gets my goat, after hearing that oral contraception is actually already feasible for
men (and has been, for years if not decades), is realizing (again) how things now are so much
more designed to service women, and ignore (if not outright victimize) men.
Women, as you might expect, are constantly touting "The Pill" for them as an all but inalienable
right, and agitating for mandated universal health insurance coverage for them (e.g.,
CoverMyPills.org, "The Need for and Cost of Mandating Private Insurance Coverage of
Contraception"); as, clearly, the 30-40% full coverage under existing plans is a "national scandal",
and must be corrected as soon as possible - never mind that similar protection for men is never
even contemplated or mentioned, let alone incorporated in such demands (as usual).
This, despite the already massively unequal consequences of unintended parenthood for men,
compared to women (as we all know, in no case can a woman ever be a parent against her will
today [not between widely available contraception, legal abortion, plus "legal abandonment"
laws]... whereas for men it happens all the time, and there's nothing any man can do about it, once
it happens; plus, the practical reality that the child-support indentured-servitude machine
essentially soley targets men). I can't speak for anyone else, but this is the sort of thing that really
makes my blood boil.
In any just society, access to effective, safe oral contraceptives would be exactly equal, for both
men and women; of course, we all know it'll be a long time and a lot of work to see anything like
that where we live. Meanwhile, the knowledge that "The Pill" for men exists, and that feminazis are
willfully ignoring its general unavailablity to men while simultaneously pushing for their own access
as a basic right, is yet one more concrete example we can cite, proving their hypocracy and
special pleading.
On a personal level, all of us who know the current facts, can at least check out the suitability of
using these tools to protect ourselves, as well as all fellow men we'd care to save from the "oops"
involuntary-parenthood trap women so love to spring on us - saving the world will take a while yet;
but saving each other, one on one, is at least well within our power right now..."
|
|