The Repression of Good Men
Arthur Smith
Many men, even relatively young ones nowadays, wonder why it is that they cannot easily
get what they want out of life, why it seems like a massive struggle to either get what one
wants, or on the other hand to hang on to what one wants even if one is fortunate enough
to get it in the first place.
For what do men want anyway?
They want jobs, they want respect, they want happiness, but above all, except in a minority
of cases, they want women.
We cannot help this desire we have to be united with at least one woman, because it is
the strongest desire implanted in man by Nature, without which he would not reproduce,
and the race would soon die out.
But of course, if any particular man fails to reproduce, that does not mean the race dies
out, it only means his personal lineage dies out, his own unique genes do not get passed
on to the next generation.
We might say to dramatise it emotively that in that limited sense his kind becomes extinct.
For whilst the geneticists speculate on how they can modify humans to order, like in some
science fiction dystopia come true – which worryingly incidentally, many modern scientists
seem to view as a utopia, not a nightmare as it appears to most of the rest of us – Nature
has been conducting its own genetics program for millions of years, and in the case of
humans, it has been using this mechanism of attraction and blending between the sexes
to roll out its new models, every generation.
And has Nature not been supremely successful in this way?
Without our interference, it has created the most beautiful and talented creatures who
have ever lived upon this planet, men and women who have astounded the rest of us and
indeed one another with their incredible beauty, talents and indeed intelligence, so that
the world we know around us has been created mostly by a long series of geniuses, like
all the scientists, artists and thinkers throughout history whose famous names are all
familiar to us.
Whether man can improve any on Nature by genetic intervention is yet to be seen, but if
the experiments in plastic surgery are anything to go by, which so often leave women
looking less natural and less beautiful instead of more, perhaps we should not expect too
much too soon.
Because it is one thing to have a language like the genetic code, which is often referred to
as a most enormous “book” by modern geneticists, but it is quite another thing to know
how to create something significant and meaningful in any language, just as it is only the
genius who can write fine poems, song lyrics, plays and novels in any language, like
English, and we may find in time that the same applies to playing around with and
rewriting the genetic code.
But this means used by Nature to create new life forms which we call sex, instead of being
merely a natural thing that goes on without much analysis as in the animal kingdom
generally, in the human world has become a means to control men, yet men in general do
not see it that way, and have been persuaded to believe that it is their greatest joy,
privilege and pleasure.
And not only are modern men controlled by sex, they are now even controlled within sex,
for a great “mystique” has been built up around sex in the feminist era, and instead of man
being simply allowed to do what comes naturally as he has done for thousands or indeed
millions of years in one form or another, now he has to learn an endless number of “dos
and don’ts” which mostly have the goal of respecting and giving pleasure to women and
denying it to himself.
He is not interested in all the swathe of mystical, spiritual or emotional embellishment that
modern feministic women seek to clothe sex in, he just wants to relieve his sexual tension
as quickly as possible – it’s a very simple animal thing – but even in this most urgent and
basic of animal needs, he is being dictated to by women, which in most cases is just
going to take the “joy” out of sex for him altogether.
Is it inconsiderate for a man to have sex with a woman in five minutes or less, which is
pretty much what will happen if he is young or fit enough and does it how he wants it,
rather than having to virtually enrol at “women’s sexuality university” and read a hundred
books and watch videos, supposedly trying to learn how to do what every other animal in
Nature does without any instruction whatsoever?
Just consider Nature in general for example.
Whilst any animal, including the human one, is engaged in sex, it is extremely vulnerable
to attack, and indeed very liable to be attacked due to sexual jealousy and rivalry, if the
sex act is not carried out in as much secrecy and seclusion as possible.
There are certain creatures in nature for example, who have sex in the manner of a mass
orgy, barging other males out of the way constantly, and trying to substitute themselves for
the male they have pushed aside to mount and fertilise the female themselves, which
ironically is the kind of mass orgy sexual behaviour that we are now seeing in certain
sectors of human society.
But this unending sexual jealousy and rivalry in Nature, which applies just as much to the
human kingdom, is one extremely good reason for not boasting about sex or talking about
our “exploits” openly at all. For all we are going to do is invite envy and hostility, by
displaying our sexual prowess in any way, and risk attack on ourselves or our woman in
some way.
Fortunately for humans, they have homes with lockable doors, so that they rarely are
vulnerable to direct physical attack or interference in their sexual activities, but that still
doesn’t stop the envy, and the desire of men to have women who are already in
relationships with other men, which most men wouldn’t hesitate to do if they believed they
could get away with it, for example in respect of the numerous married or attached
celebrity women in the media who so many men unashamedly lust over.
We do not give one fig for the feelings about the man concerned, who is the woman’s
partner, as we fantasize what we would do to her if we could only get our hands on her, do
we?
That is reality, that is how we actually feel, and therefore if society does not control sex
activity very strictly by imposing taboo behaviours, for example by limiting it to marriage or
committed relationships, and preventing the flaunting in public as happens now of women
who are already married or in relationships, men in general will not think twice about
adulterating another man’s woman, should he get the chance.
This is yet another very powerful reason why a lot of people cling to religious ideals,
because they feel threatened by the immoral “permissive society”, quite simply apart from
all the other considerations, because it is a threat to their woman and their sexual
relationship with her.
Basically, men who do not cling to these kinds of religious or moral principles, have just
been conned into accepting that their woman will sleep around if she wants to, or can be
expected to have had any number of sex partners before she met him.
So we can see, that such attraction to religion, may not even have anything greatly to do
with whether the person truly believes there is a God or not, but because he is clinging to
a structure which has the effect of protecting his exclusivity of rights to his woman and the
sex life he has with her, it really can be that simple, and likewise women may cling to a
religious moral structure, so that they too do not feel sexually threatened.
The zealously god denying modern men really do not see how infernally deep this
mugging of them actually goes, because put quite bluntly, by rejecting the moral structure
imposed by religion, they have given the license to men to be serial adulterers or
Casanovas, and their women to be what men and women throughout all previous history
have commonly called whores.
But we were not even trying to imply a moral or religious judgement here, we were just
talking about how in Nature generally, the sex act puts both parties into a state in which
they are very vulnerable to attack from predators or rivals, and so naturally, the tendency in
Nature has been to get the act over as quickly as possible, and we put it to you, this is
precisely what a man would naturally do as a result of the urgent forces at work within him,
if he was not having his mind and behaviour interfered with by the demands of modern
feminist philosophy.
Arthur Smith
Many men, even relatively young ones nowadays, wonder why it is that they cannot easily
get what they want out of life, why it seems like a massive struggle to either get what one
wants, or on the other hand to hang on to what one wants even if one is fortunate enough
to get it in the first place.
For what do men want anyway?
They want jobs, they want respect, they want happiness, but above all, except in a minority
of cases, they want women.
We cannot help this desire we have to be united with at least one woman, because it is
the strongest desire implanted in man by Nature, without which he would not reproduce,
and the race would soon die out.
But of course, if any particular man fails to reproduce, that does not mean the race dies
out, it only means his personal lineage dies out, his own unique genes do not get passed
on to the next generation.
We might say to dramatise it emotively that in that limited sense his kind becomes extinct.
For whilst the geneticists speculate on how they can modify humans to order, like in some
science fiction dystopia come true – which worryingly incidentally, many modern scientists
seem to view as a utopia, not a nightmare as it appears to most of the rest of us – Nature
has been conducting its own genetics program for millions of years, and in the case of
humans, it has been using this mechanism of attraction and blending between the sexes
to roll out its new models, every generation.
And has Nature not been supremely successful in this way?
Without our interference, it has created the most beautiful and talented creatures who
have ever lived upon this planet, men and women who have astounded the rest of us and
indeed one another with their incredible beauty, talents and indeed intelligence, so that
the world we know around us has been created mostly by a long series of geniuses, like
all the scientists, artists and thinkers throughout history whose famous names are all
familiar to us.
Whether man can improve any on Nature by genetic intervention is yet to be seen, but if
the experiments in plastic surgery are anything to go by, which so often leave women
looking less natural and less beautiful instead of more, perhaps we should not expect too
much too soon.
Because it is one thing to have a language like the genetic code, which is often referred to
as a most enormous “book” by modern geneticists, but it is quite another thing to know
how to create something significant and meaningful in any language, just as it is only the
genius who can write fine poems, song lyrics, plays and novels in any language, like
English, and we may find in time that the same applies to playing around with and
rewriting the genetic code.
But this means used by Nature to create new life forms which we call sex, instead of being
merely a natural thing that goes on without much analysis as in the animal kingdom
generally, in the human world has become a means to control men, yet men in general do
not see it that way, and have been persuaded to believe that it is their greatest joy,
privilege and pleasure.
And not only are modern men controlled by sex, they are now even controlled within sex,
for a great “mystique” has been built up around sex in the feminist era, and instead of man
being simply allowed to do what comes naturally as he has done for thousands or indeed
millions of years in one form or another, now he has to learn an endless number of “dos
and don’ts” which mostly have the goal of respecting and giving pleasure to women and
denying it to himself.
He is not interested in all the swathe of mystical, spiritual or emotional embellishment that
modern feministic women seek to clothe sex in, he just wants to relieve his sexual tension
as quickly as possible – it’s a very simple animal thing – but even in this most urgent and
basic of animal needs, he is being dictated to by women, which in most cases is just
going to take the “joy” out of sex for him altogether.
Is it inconsiderate for a man to have sex with a woman in five minutes or less, which is
pretty much what will happen if he is young or fit enough and does it how he wants it,
rather than having to virtually enrol at “women’s sexuality university” and read a hundred
books and watch videos, supposedly trying to learn how to do what every other animal in
Nature does without any instruction whatsoever?
Just consider Nature in general for example.
Whilst any animal, including the human one, is engaged in sex, it is extremely vulnerable
to attack, and indeed very liable to be attacked due to sexual jealousy and rivalry, if the
sex act is not carried out in as much secrecy and seclusion as possible.
There are certain creatures in nature for example, who have sex in the manner of a mass
orgy, barging other males out of the way constantly, and trying to substitute themselves for
the male they have pushed aside to mount and fertilise the female themselves, which
ironically is the kind of mass orgy sexual behaviour that we are now seeing in certain
sectors of human society.
But this unending sexual jealousy and rivalry in Nature, which applies just as much to the
human kingdom, is one extremely good reason for not boasting about sex or talking about
our “exploits” openly at all. For all we are going to do is invite envy and hostility, by
displaying our sexual prowess in any way, and risk attack on ourselves or our woman in
some way.
Fortunately for humans, they have homes with lockable doors, so that they rarely are
vulnerable to direct physical attack or interference in their sexual activities, but that still
doesn’t stop the envy, and the desire of men to have women who are already in
relationships with other men, which most men wouldn’t hesitate to do if they believed they
could get away with it, for example in respect of the numerous married or attached
celebrity women in the media who so many men unashamedly lust over.
We do not give one fig for the feelings about the man concerned, who is the woman’s
partner, as we fantasize what we would do to her if we could only get our hands on her, do
we?
That is reality, that is how we actually feel, and therefore if society does not control sex
activity very strictly by imposing taboo behaviours, for example by limiting it to marriage or
committed relationships, and preventing the flaunting in public as happens now of women
who are already married or in relationships, men in general will not think twice about
adulterating another man’s woman, should he get the chance.
This is yet another very powerful reason why a lot of people cling to religious ideals,
because they feel threatened by the immoral “permissive society”, quite simply apart from
all the other considerations, because it is a threat to their woman and their sexual
relationship with her.
Basically, men who do not cling to these kinds of religious or moral principles, have just
been conned into accepting that their woman will sleep around if she wants to, or can be
expected to have had any number of sex partners before she met him.
So we can see, that such attraction to religion, may not even have anything greatly to do
with whether the person truly believes there is a God or not, but because he is clinging to
a structure which has the effect of protecting his exclusivity of rights to his woman and the
sex life he has with her, it really can be that simple, and likewise women may cling to a
religious moral structure, so that they too do not feel sexually threatened.
The zealously god denying modern men really do not see how infernally deep this
mugging of them actually goes, because put quite bluntly, by rejecting the moral structure
imposed by religion, they have given the license to men to be serial adulterers or
Casanovas, and their women to be what men and women throughout all previous history
have commonly called whores.
But we were not even trying to imply a moral or religious judgement here, we were just
talking about how in Nature generally, the sex act puts both parties into a state in which
they are very vulnerable to attack from predators or rivals, and so naturally, the tendency in
Nature has been to get the act over as quickly as possible, and we put it to you, this is
precisely what a man would naturally do as a result of the urgent forces at work within him,
if he was not having his mind and behaviour interfered with by the demands of modern
feminist philosophy.
 |  |  |
| The Repression of Good Men Arthur Smith |
The War on Feminism Arthur Smith -------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
