The UN (which actively promotes hatred of all things male and is engaged in the
deliberate destruction of the heterosexual family) convened a conference in Geneva to
debate Internet Speech Limits. In November 1997 international experts gathered to
discuss ways to combat so called ‘hate messages’ on the Internet. Under the guise of
fears about racist extremist groups and pornography, the UN seeks to eliminate all forms
of politically incorrect speech on the Internet. Some countries have moved towards
making Internet service providers responsible for the content they supply. Already men’s
and fathers’ rights lists, viewed by the Feminazi as terrorist organizations, have in some
cases been censored or even banned. However, free speech may prove more difficult to
control on the World Wide Web than in individual nations. The cybermind still has free
thought coursing through its synapses. If you look, you will find opinion of every shade on
every conceivable issue. You may find some of what you discover uncomfortable or
offensive, but what is important is that individuals are allowed to state their cases and
present their ideas. Totalitarian regimes may control totally what people say, but they can
never control what a free mind may think. You are reading such thoughts now. Here in this
place, in the cybermind, you also are free to think your own thoughts.
The Feminazi know that free speech and thought is not an option in the New World State.
They have never allowed criticism or dissent within their own movement and they will do
everything they can to ensure that all resistance to the new Femutopia is crushed.
The first casualty when war comes is truth.
— Hiram Johnson 1866-1945
When the Berlin wall came down the world seem to enter a new age of freedom and
peace. For many, the latent threat of a World War III immediately seemed to evaporate.
We did not realize it at the time, but the real World War III, the Gender War, had been well
under way for a quarter of a century before the graffitied concrete began to shatter.
All wars have casualties. The vast majority of these are men. All wars are ultimately wars
of attrition. It often seems that wars only cease when the numbers of dead finally become
politically and socially unacceptable. Only then, does a peace process begin. Throughout
history it appears that such senseless sacrifice has always been necessary before people
and nations will begin to talk, standing upon mountains of corpses of the slain. If we are to
stop a war it would surely make sense to begin the peace process before a single soldier
dies, but what if it were deliberate policy that the maximum number of soldiers do die?
What if it was both politically and socially acceptable that all men were to be casualties?
What if it was culturally desirable also? Is this an unthinkable concept? I think not. I think it
is the norm.
Although wars usually appear to have political and moral causes and these often provide
the final flashpoint (e.g. the assassination of Franz Ferdinand or the invasion of Poland)
these events would not in themselves lead to protracted World Wars unless other
conditions were in place. These factors are most often economic. Arming and supplying
wars are undoubtedly one of the most lucrative business ventures known. This is not to
say that industrialists themselves cause wars, but wars may well last longer because of
such interests. Ultimately, war can have long term economic benefits, at least for the
victors. Economics and politics collude in commencing and continuing wars, not
necessarily by a conscious conspiracy, but because the same end serves the interests of
both parties. However, no war can start without the weapons and the willingness of men to
use them and if necessary, lay down their lives to defend their families and their society. In
the same way, these mechanisms apply to the current Gender War.
We can view this from another perspective. It is indeed as if there must be human
sacrifice to ensure prosperity. The sacrifice is made to the Goddess of prosperity in the
form of the State, the Mother Country – represented at the most basic, personal level by
the woman. Much as the ‘conspiracy’ that fuels the gender war today. This insane alliance
is responsible for allowing an equally insane ideology to spring up and cause yet another
catastrophic conflict.
To look at this in more detail, it is useful to explore the analogy of the ‘fire triangle’ that is
used to explain combustion. For a fire to start there has to be fuel, oxygen and heat. In
terms of the Gender War, fuel can be seen as an economic system based on high levels
of consumerism. The ‘oxygen’ to be the natural protection and survival mechanisms that
operate between the genders. The ‘heat’ has been applied by the Feminazi movement.
As we explored in Part One, the ‘conspiracy’ operates with the willingness of those who
control the economies of the opposing nations to reap the Gender War’s economic
rewards. This in turn conspires with the drive for a One World, Feminized State. The
economic benefits of any arms race are often a justifiable excuse when it shown that such
strategies vastly improve people’s standards of living. What can we say about increased
standards of living that are paid for in blood by increased standards of dying? We
obviously readily embrace such ‘economics’ still today. We live on a powder keg. So it
has also been since 1945. The economics of capitalism have continued where they left
off. Instead of tanks and planes they now make cars and vacuum cleaners. Instead of guns
and bombs they make stereo systems and microwaves. These items along with all the
other benefits of civilization that we work throughout our lives for are produced for our
consumption and they are seen as indicators of prosperity. They are now also part of the
logistics of Gender War, but they are not the actual weapons. The real weapons are our
children. In a world where the concept of individual nations is being neutralized, who could
deny that our children are what we will fight hardest for? Who is it who uses the children as
weapons most effectively? Who is it that controls the use of these human weapons? Who
is it who seizes them again and again? It is women who are the winners in this war and it
is men that fall wounded and bleeding from the attack. For a one World State to exist it
must take over the role of provider and protector of the human family (now defined as a
woman and her children). Legislation already exists within the UN to facilitate this.
It was always then as it is now, overwhelmingly men who have to fall victim to war. Their
standards of suffering are never measured though and never set against any standards of
living. Whether it be on the battlefield of shot and shell or in the legalized Passchendaele
of a divorce court, men are murdered in their thousands. Now as always, the Goddess of
prosperity is placated by oceans of blood from the corpses of the ritually slain.
The nation that benefited the most in terms of economic wealth from warfare is ironically
the one that is perhaps the most poisoned and enslaved by the Medusa’s dark angels
today. The headquarters of the United Nations stands like a colossal headstone on its
soil. Just like its ineffectual predecessor, the UN has allowed the insanity to take hold
once more. What is worse is the fact that the UN is now the vehicle for it and, as always, in
this new undeclared war - the Gender War - it is men and especially young men who are
the cannon fodder both in financial terms and in the normally accepted sense. They of
course, will also have to defend this insanity, predominantly with American weapons and
American lives, from any nation that resists or opposes it. They will pay for it with their
blood.
deliberate destruction of the heterosexual family) convened a conference in Geneva to
debate Internet Speech Limits. In November 1997 international experts gathered to
discuss ways to combat so called ‘hate messages’ on the Internet. Under the guise of
fears about racist extremist groups and pornography, the UN seeks to eliminate all forms
of politically incorrect speech on the Internet. Some countries have moved towards
making Internet service providers responsible for the content they supply. Already men’s
and fathers’ rights lists, viewed by the Feminazi as terrorist organizations, have in some
cases been censored or even banned. However, free speech may prove more difficult to
control on the World Wide Web than in individual nations. The cybermind still has free
thought coursing through its synapses. If you look, you will find opinion of every shade on
every conceivable issue. You may find some of what you discover uncomfortable or
offensive, but what is important is that individuals are allowed to state their cases and
present their ideas. Totalitarian regimes may control totally what people say, but they can
never control what a free mind may think. You are reading such thoughts now. Here in this
place, in the cybermind, you also are free to think your own thoughts.
The Feminazi know that free speech and thought is not an option in the New World State.
They have never allowed criticism or dissent within their own movement and they will do
everything they can to ensure that all resistance to the new Femutopia is crushed.
The first casualty when war comes is truth.
— Hiram Johnson 1866-1945
When the Berlin wall came down the world seem to enter a new age of freedom and
peace. For many, the latent threat of a World War III immediately seemed to evaporate.
We did not realize it at the time, but the real World War III, the Gender War, had been well
under way for a quarter of a century before the graffitied concrete began to shatter.
All wars have casualties. The vast majority of these are men. All wars are ultimately wars
of attrition. It often seems that wars only cease when the numbers of dead finally become
politically and socially unacceptable. Only then, does a peace process begin. Throughout
history it appears that such senseless sacrifice has always been necessary before people
and nations will begin to talk, standing upon mountains of corpses of the slain. If we are to
stop a war it would surely make sense to begin the peace process before a single soldier
dies, but what if it were deliberate policy that the maximum number of soldiers do die?
What if it was both politically and socially acceptable that all men were to be casualties?
What if it was culturally desirable also? Is this an unthinkable concept? I think not. I think it
is the norm.
Although wars usually appear to have political and moral causes and these often provide
the final flashpoint (e.g. the assassination of Franz Ferdinand or the invasion of Poland)
these events would not in themselves lead to protracted World Wars unless other
conditions were in place. These factors are most often economic. Arming and supplying
wars are undoubtedly one of the most lucrative business ventures known. This is not to
say that industrialists themselves cause wars, but wars may well last longer because of
such interests. Ultimately, war can have long term economic benefits, at least for the
victors. Economics and politics collude in commencing and continuing wars, not
necessarily by a conscious conspiracy, but because the same end serves the interests of
both parties. However, no war can start without the weapons and the willingness of men to
use them and if necessary, lay down their lives to defend their families and their society. In
the same way, these mechanisms apply to the current Gender War.
We can view this from another perspective. It is indeed as if there must be human
sacrifice to ensure prosperity. The sacrifice is made to the Goddess of prosperity in the
form of the State, the Mother Country – represented at the most basic, personal level by
the woman. Much as the ‘conspiracy’ that fuels the gender war today. This insane alliance
is responsible for allowing an equally insane ideology to spring up and cause yet another
catastrophic conflict.
To look at this in more detail, it is useful to explore the analogy of the ‘fire triangle’ that is
used to explain combustion. For a fire to start there has to be fuel, oxygen and heat. In
terms of the Gender War, fuel can be seen as an economic system based on high levels
of consumerism. The ‘oxygen’ to be the natural protection and survival mechanisms that
operate between the genders. The ‘heat’ has been applied by the Feminazi movement.
As we explored in Part One, the ‘conspiracy’ operates with the willingness of those who
control the economies of the opposing nations to reap the Gender War’s economic
rewards. This in turn conspires with the drive for a One World, Feminized State. The
economic benefits of any arms race are often a justifiable excuse when it shown that such
strategies vastly improve people’s standards of living. What can we say about increased
standards of living that are paid for in blood by increased standards of dying? We
obviously readily embrace such ‘economics’ still today. We live on a powder keg. So it
has also been since 1945. The economics of capitalism have continued where they left
off. Instead of tanks and planes they now make cars and vacuum cleaners. Instead of guns
and bombs they make stereo systems and microwaves. These items along with all the
other benefits of civilization that we work throughout our lives for are produced for our
consumption and they are seen as indicators of prosperity. They are now also part of the
logistics of Gender War, but they are not the actual weapons. The real weapons are our
children. In a world where the concept of individual nations is being neutralized, who could
deny that our children are what we will fight hardest for? Who is it who uses the children as
weapons most effectively? Who is it that controls the use of these human weapons? Who
is it who seizes them again and again? It is women who are the winners in this war and it
is men that fall wounded and bleeding from the attack. For a one World State to exist it
must take over the role of provider and protector of the human family (now defined as a
woman and her children). Legislation already exists within the UN to facilitate this.
It was always then as it is now, overwhelmingly men who have to fall victim to war. Their
standards of suffering are never measured though and never set against any standards of
living. Whether it be on the battlefield of shot and shell or in the legalized Passchendaele
of a divorce court, men are murdered in their thousands. Now as always, the Goddess of
prosperity is placated by oceans of blood from the corpses of the ritually slain.
The nation that benefited the most in terms of economic wealth from warfare is ironically
the one that is perhaps the most poisoned and enslaved by the Medusa’s dark angels
today. The headquarters of the United Nations stands like a colossal headstone on its
soil. Just like its ineffectual predecessor, the UN has allowed the insanity to take hold
once more. What is worse is the fact that the UN is now the vehicle for it and, as always, in
this new undeclared war - the Gender War - it is men and especially young men who are
the cannon fodder both in financial terms and in the normally accepted sense. They of
course, will also have to defend this insanity, predominantly with American weapons and
American lives, from any nation that resists or opposes it. They will pay for it with their
blood.
 |  |  |
| Head of Medusa #20 |
THE HEAD OF THE MEDUSA By Perseus PREFACE -------------------------------------------------------- WAR IS PEACE - FREEDOM IS SLAVERY - IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH — Slogan of the Ministry of Truth, ‘1984’, George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
